Friday, 6 October 2017

Maiden Call: Thoughts On Chanel Gabrielle, Twilly D'Hermès, Mugler Aura & Gucci Bloom


It’s been brewing for a little while. A mention here. A business report there. But one recent event has turned up the heat and brought the mixture to a boil. And now there’s no avoiding it: the perfume industry is desperate for the cash of young women. Trouble is, desperation is often served with fear.

I’m sure you’ve worked out which event I’m referring to: Chanel’s launch of Gabrielle, their first stand-alone, mainstream, feminine scent for over a decade. It arrives roughly at the same time as Twilly D’Hermès and Gucci Bloom, and not long after Dior’s Poison Girl and Mugler’s Aura. Look a little bit further back and you’ll also find Estée Lauder’s Modern Muse (whose flankers just keep coming) as well as Guerlain’s La Petite Robe Noire. All of them - with their marketing, their design and their smells - are clamouring for the attention of females below the age of 30.

The direct reason for this is clear: very few young women are buying perfume (see Zoe Wood's Guardian article for more). Why they’re not buying perfume is a more complex matter, probably best left for another day. But in simple terms, I’d suggest it stems from a new generation’s desire not to follow its predecessors’ habits, and also from financial realities around youngsters having less disposable income and needing to save their earnings for basics like accommodation. However, like I said, let’s put that to one side for today.

At the moment, I’m more interested in what these brands consider to be the smells that will entice twentysomethings to part with their pennies. In other words: what are the olfactory codes that are being chosen to represent the identities of the women currently establishing their independence, entering the workplace and starting their families?

Well, if we’re to draw our conclusions from Gabrielle, the current ‘modern young woman’ is interested in safety, predictability and a very soft-focus rendition of girliness. If those sound like harsh words, I should make it clear that I don’t think Gabrielle is a bad perfume. On the contrary, I think it’s extremely well-composed (it is by Olivier Polge, after all) and it radiates and lasts with the sort of impressiveness we rightly expect from one of the world’s most prestigious brands. But despite all the marketing claims about affinities with Mademoiselle Chanel’s bold sense of rebellion, it displays no novelty.

Bright citruses. Large, department-store-friendly, catch-all florals (mostly ylang ylang). And then the seemingly obligatory base of musks. You’ve smelt it all before. Granted, you haven’t often smelt it in such a seamless, professionally-assembled manner. But you have definitely smelt it before. Far from being a mould-breaker, Gabrielle doesn’t know quite which identity to adopt. She seems to possess no clear vision of her own personality, so she just repeats what all her friends are doing. Consider this in the light of the scent’s advertising material - which makes heavy use of Mlle Chanel’s statement about appropriating a self-selected identity - and you can’t help but chuckle at the irony.

But then, having said all that, I genuinely believe that it is unrealistic of us to expect originality from Chanel’s mainstream range. Gabrielle was never going to be an original. There is far too much riding on it and far too much being spent on its promotion - for instance: an entire, two-storey pop-up shop on Bond Street - for it to be the slightest bit risky. Yes, it’s a state of affairs that leaves a sour smell in our noses, but consider this: maybe we should actually be grateful that Chanel are producing money-spinners which then allow them to inject more creativity into their low-key releases, such as the Exclusifs.

The brand’s publicity material claims that tuberose is present in the composition. If that’s what they’re saying, I’m confident it can’t be an outright fib, but I can’t say I can detect the flower’s dramatic personality in the final product, except perhaps as part of the pearly haze in the background. It’s far more prominent - in fact, it takes centre stage - in Alberto MorillasBloom for Gucci. While there’s no denying that this is the best feminine creation the brand has given us for years (not a difficult feat, mind you) there is also a shoulder-sagging weariness in its white floral heart. It ticks all the boxes as far as the creamy, coconutty, buttery facets are concerned. But it brings nothing new to the field, a fact made even more stark when you compare the fragrance with the likes of Nuit De Bakélite from Naomi Goodsir or Tubéreuse Manifeste from Evody. Bloom is the young woman playing the vintage card, but in an uncommitted, self-conscious way. She cares far too much about what other people think.

This brings us to Mugler’s Aura - put together by Daphne Bugey, Amandine Clerc-Marie, Christophe Raynaud and Marie Salamagne - whose tag line may well have been, ‘We need to care about what people think.’ It’s telling that even a brand whose unique selling point was polarisation has had to suppress that aspect of its identity; clearly, Womanity was one step (or twelve??) too far. Mugler would like us to believe that they’ve retained their edginess - that emerald green is meant to make us think of a jungle on Venus - but don’t be fooled. Aura is essentially a vanillic, gourmand composition, with a few green, vine-like, gunpowdery elements making a brief appearance at the start. I dare say, at some stage of the scent’s development, these more intriguing players may well have been granted key roles. But at the moment, bravery is just as hard to come by at Mugler HQ’s mainstream division as it is anywhere else, so they were relegated to bit parts.

And finally, our most interesting prospect: Christine Nagel’s Twilly for Hermès. Displaying the perfumer’s fascination with tart, vegetal notes, it chops up some water-soaked ginger alongside a few, somewhat demure tuberose petals and a scattering of clean wood shavings. Remarkably, the concoction does display some of the playfulness insisted upon by the advertising material, but the colours are too muted and the spirit is too restrained for the whole to be able to to fizz with a life all its own. So, yet again, we have a sense of timidity, a feeling that this woman would make the world her own if only... if only what? If only she didn’t have bills to pay, I guess.

Somewhere, there is a winning recipe waiting to be discovered, a particular blend that will make young women feel they’ve found an olfactory reflection of their world. I don’t think the big brands have quite come across it yet. Until they do, I suppose we have to wait for the current pot to boil over completely... and then see what's served up next.

[Reviews based on samples provided in 2017 by the respective brands, except Bloom, which was obtained by the author.]

Persolaise

4 comments:

  1. Carolyn Middleton8 October 2017 at 15:42

    Very interesting to read your take on Aura. My friend, who I've mentioned here before regarding her relatively newly acquired interest in fragrance after years of accompanying me to specialist shops, mentioned the other week when we were visiting Glasgow that she'd been impressed by a fragrance on a scent strip in a recent magazine, so much so that she'd actually applied it to her wrist. Of course, when I asked her what it was, said said she didn't remember! She finally came up with the name Mugler, so I marched her to Frasers department store & made her sniff all the Muglers on display. She immediately identified Aura as the ne, which surprised me as it's outwith her usual preferences, though she doesn't use fragrance that much anyway. It was her birthday during our trip, so I managed to sneak off while she was shoe shopping & bought her a bottle - she was thrilled, despite having said she didn't want to mark the occasion (I also took her for dinner at a superb restaurant in Glasgow's West End, which she also loved). Bless her, when I sent her the link to a Fragrantica article about the new Mugler set-up in a Paris department store, which also described Aura as an 'iconic' fragrance, & about which I commented that she'd done well discovering something so different from her usual, she mailed me back & said she'd had a good teacher.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carolyn, thanks so much for sharing that wonderful story.

      And you know what: that's the third time this week that I've heard of someone really liking Aura. So who knows: maybe Mugler are on to something after all. Maybe their decision to disguise plain old vanilla with *just* the right level of newness will pay off.

      Delete
  2. This is a thoughtful review. I agree the industry really wants to tap into a new bloodline. The under thirty crowd is quite different. When I was a girl I wanted to have a grown up perfume, like my mom's . She wore Je Reviens, and she chose Arpege for me. I always liked the Jennifer Lopez scents-I think JLo gives her customers credit for some intelligence, and I read she was personally involved in the original fragrance. I wonder if the under thirty crowd is jaded because of what has been pushed on them as consumers. I wonder if perfume is just another product to them. If you haven't been trained to really use your nose is there any difference between the Britney Spears scents and the Guerlain classics? Maybe they prefer the casual aspects of the Britney scents-affordable and easy to find.
    I have no answer-only more questions, I'm afraid. Thank you for the thoughtful analysis, and have a good weekend :)
    Sincerely,
    Carole

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carole, thanks for the comment. And yes, you raise a good point. Because there is so much perfume around, it becomes just another product, as you say. Mind you, all those Britney-like celeb scents have lost TONS of sales lately. Most of them have been discontinued.

      And by the way, I much prefer questions to answers :-)

      Delete

Thanks very much for reading my site and taking the time to leave a comment.

Please note that whilst the full range of views is welcome on Persolaise.com, comments containing expletives and/or abusive language may not be published.

If you're using Safari on an Apple device, you may experience some difficulties with submitting comments. Please consider using Google's Chrome browser on your Apple device; this may make it easier to leave your comment.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...