Friday, 13 October 2017

Cinema Scent: Blade Runner 2049 (dir. Denis Villeneuve; 2017)


Despite the dubious gender politics, the self-important pace and the portentous hamminess of Jared Leto, it would be churlish to deny that Blade Runner 2049 provides much to enjoy and admire. There are a few genuinely eyebrow-raising surprises in the plot, which sees yet another bedraggled policeman hunting an important replicant. The sound design almost radiates out of the screen like a three-dimensional entity. And the various nods and winks to the original possess a power that goes beyond that of mere nostalgia. So yes, even though I'm not sure it's a sequel we needed, I would urge all fans of the Ridley Scott version to watch it.

For those of us who like to spare a thought for our noses whilst we're at the cinema, Denis Villeneuve has planted a couple of curiosities. Indeed, one of the very first things that's mentioned in the film is a smell. As Ryan Gosling's LAPD Officer, K, exchanges pleasantries with Dave Bautista's Sapper Morton, he asks about the scent in the air. When he's informed that it's nothing but humble old garlic, we're presumably supposed to draw the conclusion that such vegetal odours are no longer present in this world, and that they hark back to an earlier - more 'authentic'? - time. (This did lead me to wonder about the quality of the food at all those endless Los Angeles noodle bars, but let's put that question aside for now.)

Smell comes up again much later in the story when Gosling asks a different character - and I'll try to keep this spoiler-free - to verify whether a particular object is what it appears to be. The way this character meets the request is by bringing the object to his nose and giving it a good sniff. And suddenly, one of the film's many ideas is crystallised. No matter how far technology takes us, no matter how extensively we engineer our environment, there will always be something about our natures that will remain obsessed with drawing dividing lines and with finding ways of making distinctions about what lies on either side of them. Human, or not. Real, or not. Natural, or not. The theme manifests itself each time a character recalls a blazing, smokey fire, or looks down in horror at a blood-soaked shirt, or even succumbs to an inexplicable show of tears. And although this existential question isn't handled in any way which betters that of the 1982 classic, just seeing it up on the big screen again is wonderful.

---
For more Cinema Scent reviews, please click here.

8 comments:

  1. I remember the garlic incident but fail to recall the other olfactory episode you refer to. I enjoyed the movie (though I agree about Leto). Loved the pummeling, assaultive music. Never saw the first version.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Richpot, thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.

      The other incident is when Gosling takes the little animal carving to Barkhad Abdi's character.

      Yes, the music was highly evocative, but it's essentially an extension of the music from the first part... WHICH YOU REALLY MUST WATCH! You're in for a treat :-)

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the additional reminder to see this film, Dariush. Great post! R

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks very much. And enjoy the movie :-)

      Delete
  3. Thanks for the mini review, I'm very much looking forward to seeing the movie. The 1982 original is one of those movies I can watch and have watched several times, and that's a classic in my book :) As to the cast, I don't know what to think of Leto, I'm confused by his over-the-top image, and have yet to see him in any major role. And Gosling, I have mixed feelings about him too, it seems like his expression never changes :D as if he doesn't move a muscle in his face. Anyhow, I'm really looking forward to the movie, no matter the reviews!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zara, please let me know what you think of it when you watch it. I actually rate Gosling quite highly, although this film probably isn’t the best showcase of his talent.

      Delete
  4. I noticed the scent comments as well. I’m fascinated by the original film, and this was a delight. I thought the garlic comment/cooking smell was because Gosling’s character has just heated generic prepackaged food. No experience of the scents of really cooking—only a holographic fantasy.

    Love your blog (and vlog). Be well
    —HemlockSillage

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, excellent point. But then, wouldn’t he have been programmed to recognise various smells?

      Thanks so much for taking the time to leave a comment and for your kind words.

      Delete

Thanks very much for reading my site and taking the time to leave a comment.

Please note that whilst the full range of views is welcome on Persolaise.com, comments containing expletives and/or abusive language may not be published.

If you're using Safari on an Apple device, you may experience some difficulties with submitting comments. Please consider using Google's Chrome browser on your Apple device; this may make it easier to leave your comment.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...