Friday, February 6, 2015

Persolaise Review: Aromatics In White from Clinique (Nicolas Beaulieu; 2015)


By the pricking of my thumbs, something musky this way comes. Or should that be, "something snowy"? Two trends seem to be gaining momentum in the perfume world - i) a greater emphasis on creamy musk materials; ii) a more prominent use of pearl-coloured aesthetics in packaging - and they both find expression in the latest release from Clinique, Aromatics In White, composed by IFF's Nicolas Beaulieu.

The scent's progenitor - the masterful Aromatics Elixir (Bernard Chant; 1971) - remains one of the most explosive marriages of rose and patchouli ever poured into a bottle, which may be why Beaulieu made the wise decision not to goad it into a direct stand-off. Instead, he's decided to use violet leaf to make the rose's wings lighter, orange to sweeten its smile and the faintest sprinkling of pepper to inject a sly sparkle into its gaze. And then comes that musky base. It's extremely quiet - many will doubtless complain that this composition's volume knob is turned way too low - but it is tenacious and it settles onto the wearer's skin with the ease of tender familiarity. It's almost as though the fiery union of the 1971 creation has travelled through the relatively chaste 90s and emerged with a greater appreciation of stability and comfort.

A sleet-covered, impressionist panorama as seen through a veil of gauze, Aromatics In White is seamlessly blended, smooth and, for my money, a far more full-bodied representation of perfumery's most popular flower than Clinique's recent Beyond Rose. That said, it's not for nothing that I started this review with a reference to witches. Beaulieu's work here sounds innocuous, but it never quite lets you forget its roots. It may be clad in delicate, pearly robes, but somewhere, in its hidden recesses, it conceals a sorceress, ready to bare her soul each time you feel inclined to write her off. It is her presence that makes this subtle piece of work commendable and compelling.

[Review based on a sample of eau de parfum provided by Clinique in 2015.]

Persolaise

8 comments:

  1. Intriguing review! I'm certainly enjoying this trend for creamy musks, especially Narciso Rodriguez's clever NARCISO. I will make sure to try the Clinique.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CPB, thanks for stopping by. Narciso is precisely the scent I was thinking of in relation to this release :-)

      I look forward to finding out what you make of this one.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for this lovely review!! So glad someone reviewed this beauty. Subdued in comparison to AE (what isn't? :-)), but with a lot of character. Elegant with a twist. After having sprayed it on I couldn't stop sniffing my wrist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Labben, thanks for your comment. Yes, I'd agree that it's very more-ish!

      Delete
  3. Forgot to add: To my nose it is a distant, more discrete relative to AE AND unisex. AE is perfectly unisex in my books. :-) In White might lean more feminine though than the Perfumers Reserve version.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Labben, is In White more feminine? Yes, maybe it is, but only by current 'western' norms. The situation might be very different in other parts of the world.

      Delete
  4. Awesome review, you said everything I was hoping this scent would be! I really need to try it, thanks for sharing your impressions!

    ReplyDelete

Thanks very much for reading my site and taking the time to leave a comment.

Please note that whilst the full range of views is welcome on Persolaise.com, comments containing expletives and/or abusive language may not be published.

If you're using Safari on an Apple device, you may experience some difficulties with submitting comments. Please consider using Google's Chrome browser on your Apple device; this may make it easier to leave your comment.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...